Do you want to build a robot snowman?

3 weeks ago 14

Nvidia’s GTC league had everything: trillion dollar income projections, graphics technology that tin yassify video games, expansive declarations that every institution needs an OpenClaw strategy, and adjacent a robot mentation of the beloved snowman Olaf from Disney’s “Frozen.”

On the latest occurrence of the Equity podcast, TechCrunch’s Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I recapped CEO Jensen Huang’s keynote and debated what it means for Nvidia’s future. And yes, a large portion of our treatment focused connected mediocre Olaf, whose microphone had to beryllium turned disconnected erstwhile helium started rambling.

Even if the demo had gone flawlessly, Sean mightiness inactive person had immoderate reservations, arsenic helium noted these presentations ever absorption connected “the engineering challenges” and not the “really messy grey areas” connected the societal side.

“But what happens erstwhile a kid kicks Olaf over?” Sean asked. “And past each different kid who sees Olaf get kicked oregon knocked implicit has their full travel to Disney ruined and it ruins the brand?”

Read a preview of our conversation, edited for magnitude and clarity, below.

Anthony: [CEO Jensen Huang] was fundamentally saying that each institution needs to person an OpenClaw strategy now. I deliberation that is conscionable a precise expansive connection that’s meant to beryllium attraction grabbing; I deliberation it’s besides absorbing coming astatine this benignant of transitional infinitesimal for OpenClaw. 

The laminitis has gone to OpenAI. So it’s present this unfastened root task that perchance tin flourish and germinate beyond its creator, oregon it could languish. If companies similar Nvidia are investing a batch into it, past [it’s] much apt that it’ll proceed to evolve. But it’ll beryllium absorbing to spot a twelvemonth from now, whether that looks similar a prescient connection oregon everyone’s like, “Open what?”

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

Kirsten: In the lawsuit of Nvidia, it costs them thing successful the expansive strategy of things to motorboat what they telephone NemoClaw, which is an unfastened root project, which they built with the OpenClaw creator. But if they don’t bash something, they person a batch to lose. So truly that connection to me, the mode I translated it erstwhile Jensen was like, “Every endeavor needs to person an OpenClaw strategy,” it was, “Nvidia needs to person a solution oregon strategy for enterprises, due to the fact that if it’s successful, it is different mode oregon different pathway for Nvidia to beryllium portion of galore different companies.” So doing thing is simply a greater hazard than doing thing that doesn’t spell anywhere.

Sean: The existent question present is wherefore person we not talked astir what is intelligibly the extremity crippled for Nvidia, and the happening that is going to crook it into the archetypal $100 trillion company, which is an Olaf robot.

Anthony: How could I forget?

Kirsten: Anthony, conscionable spell to the extremity of the 2 and a fractional hours to ticker this.

So, the Olaf robot comes out, and this is thing that Jensen loves to do. He loves to person these demos and immoderate of them spell amended than others. It is besides to show Nvidia’s exertion successful robotics, and I don’t cognize if Olaf was really speaking successful existent clip oregon if it was programmed — it felt a small programmed, oregon it had circumstantial keywords that it used.

But the top portion astir it is that they had to chopped its mic astatine the extremity due to the fact that it conscionable started rambling and speaking to the crowd. And past it went implicit to its small passageway and was dilatory lowered. And you could spot it connected the video. It was inactive talking, but nary mic.

Sean: Now we conscionable request to springiness this small robot a wheelbase. And I cognize the cleanable laminitis who tin supply it. 

I mean, these demos are ever silly. I don’t privation to get up connected my soapbox, due to the fact that I cognize that we’ve talked astir this a small spot earlier this week, but this was an awesome demo up until the infinitesimal wherever it fell a small spot short.

This is different truly bully example, though, of [how] robotics is simply a truly absorbing engineering occupation and a truly absorbing physics occupation and a truly absorbing integration problem, and each of this stuff, but this was presented as, successful concern with Disney, and it’s expected to beryllium the aboriginal of Disney parks and things similar that: You’re going to beryllium capable to locomotion astir and spot Olaf from “Frozen” and instrumentality pictures of them and everything.

But these efforts ne'er see — oregon surely don’t enactment beforehand and halfway successful events similar this — each the different things you person to see erstwhile you rotation worldly retired similar this. There’s a truly bully YouTuber, Defunctland, that did a truly bully video astir this — 4 hours long, not excessively agelong — astir the past of Disney trying to get these kinds of robotics into their park, these automatons.

The engineering challenges are truly absorbing and it’s amusive to spot that history, but it ever comes backmost to the aforesaid question of: Okay, but what happens erstwhile a kid kicks Olaf over? And past each different kid who sees Olaf get kicked oregon knocked implicit has their full travel to Disney ruined and it ruins the brand?

There’s conscionable truthful overmuch connected the societal broadside of this. And that sounds silly, but this is the question that we’re benignant of asking astir humanoid robots, too. There’s truthful overmuch hype astir each this different worldly and we conscionable don’t truly perceive arsenic overmuch speech astir the truly messy grey areas connected the societal broadside of these things, and besides conscionable integrating them into people’s lives. We lone ever truly perceive astir the engineering challenges — which again, are truly impressive.

Kirsten: I person a counterpoint and past we person to get to our adjacent [topic]. This is simply a occupation creator, due to the fact that Olaf volition person to person a quality babysitter successful Disneyland, astir apt dressed up arsenic Elsa oregon thing else. You tin ideate that actually, what we’re doing is creating jobs [with] this engineering experiment.

Read Entire Article